拟议的外国直接投资政策在印度经济上具有积极和消极的变化。虽然政治家忽略了黑暗的一面，但在采取立场之前有必要了解论证的两侧。已知外国直接投资政策在外国公司拥有51％的外国权益等特点，而国内同行49％，其中总投资至少为1亿美元，其中一半将投入后端基础设施及其在地区的介绍人口超过一百万。在这里，我觉得功能本身将带来促进排除的变化;不允许生产者从拟议的政策中达到人口的所有部分。
Sarkar将印度的直接投资政策引入了西方的工业革命，称“在技术进步的短期和长期之间存在权衡”之间的权衡“。根据Sarkar的说法，印度的外国直接投资政策的实施将导致某些负面和积极的变化。巨大的投资将导致引入改进的存储技术将彻底改变印度的存储设施，随后减少浪费。因此，51％粮食粒度腐烂的统计数据将大大减少，避免浪费。它还将以相当多的方式改善印度的供应变化。在哪里，这在某种程度上保持了真实，在我看来，政府不得依赖FDI实施足够的储存设施。相反，没有任何外国投资，政府必须采取措施确保该国内适当的储存设施充分性。翻盖到这将是由于设备良好的储存设施的影响;生产目前技术的公司将不得不关闭。
下跌将充满呆滞的股票，目前的公司的成本将超过其收入迫使他们关闭。此外，由于小型基拉那商店无法获得如此庞大的技术，他们将处于亏损状态。例如:奶酪、白软干酪等奶制品;等可以存储在零售商店比在当地的基拉那商店更长时间。在这种情况下，我认为允许国际贸易商如此大的支配会导致这些公司成为垄断企业，大量的资金和技术集中在他们的手中。所以，我觉得在制定外商直接投资政策时应该考虑到这些情况。此外，政府必须干预这样的情况，即国际公司通过更大的投资来支配印度市场。
FDI将带来连接国际和国内市场的合资企业，并使交易顺利。当地交易者与国际贸易商之间的互动将增加。仲裁将在印度市场占主导地位，因此，来自世界各地的廉价商品将在市场上浮动。Sarkar说，“经常账户可能会加班，廉价制造进口超过了不确定的农业出口。”当家庭货币贬值时，交易国具有更强大的货币将对家庭县的经济造成危险。在像印度这样的国家，更改将更多，因为印度的汇率低于美元或英镑。印度的付款平衡将陷入困境。但是，忽视了这种变化的负面方面，这意味着外国直接投资政策将增加国内市场的竞争，并诱导创新范围。Swaminathan SAnkalesria Aiyar认为，“这些（政策）不断创造新的赢家，胜过新失败者。”因此，国内贸易商和资本家将很高兴，因为他们可以通过国际贸易商获得巨大的资本。 The conditions of factories and go downs in India will improve and production will rise substantially because the international trader has greater access to capital. At this point, I feel that we will be making the international counterpart more dominant in the Indian market giving him powers to rule the market just by the virtue that he has greater share in the firm. We will end up concentrating too much power in his hands giving rise to exploitation. But, the international partner can, on the other hand, get access to resources and infrastructure in India. Hence, such firms will be able to produce at a lesser rate and earn greater margin of profit. For eg: Fast food outlets like Mc-Donald, KFC; etc are setting up outlets in India where land and labour is relatively cheaper. Hence, they can earn profits due to their low fixed and variable costs and commercial economies of scale. By claiming this, again, we would be neglecting the fact that small scale industries or unorganized sectors will lose out because of this. Since, international companies will flood Indian markets, the unorganized sector will lose out. For eg: Gradually, the local vada-pav will be costlier than a Mc-Donald burger because Mc-Donald will be in a position to reduce prices unlike the local vendor. Similarly, in the rural set up, big farmers and medium sized farmers will be able to afford infrastructure like tractors, machines, farming equipments; etc which will facilitate them in producing better products for the international firms. But, the small farmers who hardly have land holdings won’t be able to match up with the scale of production compared to the other big farmers. Companies will not invest in small farmers owing to a loss and thus, small time farmers won’t have access to upgraded and well equipped technology. Since, majority of India’s population depends on agriculture for sustainability, a rise in agro prices because of excessive demand domestically, will lead to lesser production and more self-consumption for the local farmer. Somewhere down the line, the international traders will opt for sales maximizations first, thus reducing their prices and making their products affordable for the whole class of the population. These firms would easily be able to adopt such policies because the amount of capital they would invest in the firm would be much higher than the small farmer. Thus, the enterprise could easily gain from economies of scale and thus, invest the gained revenue towards marketing cost; thus attracting consumers to shift. For eg: Even today, big supermarkets like Hypercity, D-mart; etc sell onions at Rs 23 per kg; while the local vendors sell them at Rs 30 per kg because of the commercial economies of scale. Therefore, the rate of sale by the international firm and the domestic farmer will differ considerably.
根据建议的政策和国际贸易商之间的合同，国际贸易商将提供较低的利率给农民提高其本地产品，并将其出售给国际贸易商;而不是依赖他通常面对的剥削，因为中间人。这将给大农户和小农户增加生产的动力。然而，将在印度进行贸易的公司将把利润最大化作为主要战略，并开始将资本转移到需求缺乏弹性的地区。如果这只在城市空间可行，城市地区将面临生态威胁，巨大的建筑、商场和住宅空间挤在有限的空间里。据Swaminathan S Anklesria Aiyar说，“如果没有高速公路、电力、港口和机场、铁路和管道，工业和服务业就无法扩张。”他还认为，“铁路票价已经上涨，柴油价格将每月上涨，直到隐性补贴消失，液化石油气连接已设置上限，外国投资者对普遍反避税税收措施的担忧已得到缓解。”因此，这些投资将增加企业的总成本和生态妥协。2012年9月，印度前八个城市的购物中心零售面积为6470万平方英尺，其中70%以上是在过去五年中新增的。预计在五年内将增加约2800万平方英尺的零售面积。 Despite the high vacancy level (18%) in the malls, the Delhi-National Capital Region would have an additional 10 million sq ft space by 2016, according to property consultant Cushman & Wakefield India. Thus, a lot of space will have to be diverted towards the implementation of the FDI policy. Foreign capital will be brought to India to ensure growth and profitability of the internationals and not development for the domestic. Demand will drive price giving complete power to the international trader to control the market. Small and local firms will be nowhere close to the competition of international traders, and such firms would slowly shut down.
因此，我们可以说，我们的制度存在缺陷，阻碍了印度FDI政策的适当塑造。因此，除了外国直接投资，我们的制度需要一个转变。适当执行该政策，并在拟议政策范围内采取适当措施防止剥削，将确保印度的增长和发展。因此，必须采取措施来发展和加强我们的PDS系统。必须使国内基础设施和地方贸易足够强大，能够与对外贸易竞争。必须采取适当的保护政策，防止国际公司通过资本和基础设施进行垄断。虽然，短期内我们可能会面临一些牺牲;但从长远来看，如果改变被视为该政策的积极和优势，FDI政策肯定能确保增长。
帮助我们用旧的散文修复他的笑容，需要几秒钟！
- 我们正在寻找你aced的上一篇文章，实验室和作业！
- 我们将在我们的网站上审核并发布它们。-AD收入用于支持发展中国家的儿童。
- 通过操作微笑和微笑火车，帮助支付腭裂修复手术。
